Porn score

Having admired the score of The Rite of Spring anew – while the incredible 100 years of this CONTEMPORARY composition – and writing about porn in the same time, I reminded my inveterate idea that any human stage-action is a sore, as well. Evidently, I got this thought thanks to the mix that I am a school-leaver of what is now J.Ježek's Conservatoire and that I was invited as a jury member of the contemporary dance competitions, my focus on the music used by the dancers.

After all, the Stravinskij's revolutionary masterpiece is sometimes interpreted in nude – and so, the music is entangled with carnality and even with our drives. So, I hope he is not offended if I dare one stop farther, after the 100 years...?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvJZexO75wk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_8q8kWbHcs

Besides the action itself, we should never forget that we can categorize the carnal actions according their safety/risky aspect and/or probability of impregnation, or the exclusive pleasure. The pleasure cannot be pursued without the down-to-earth ethical aspects. On the other hand, there are persons who have examined the pleasure on a level comparable with some institute, but their results are focused on earning.

Yet, if the preconditions exclude the fatal consequences, there is no ethical standard which suggests us the our life-style decision whether to prefer pleasure or asceticism. This is the failure of some sexologists who spam us with their (unspoken) presupposition that we hire them to improve our morals. The medicine has its morals and we have our morals. The medical persons are welcome to heal us, to tell us what is better or worse for our health. (Even we, here, are dealers of the sexual safety.) But they are not welcome to proliferate the religious standards, the argument of which is a prophecy, but they do not have any health reason – indeed, they sometimes even intervene the health malignantly. There is also the wide field where we can (or cannot avoid to) choose from some ratio of the health and life-style benefit or detriment: typically, the well-known slogan "with sport to health ...or to chronic disability".

Strange, but the doctors of this ilk are focused (almost exclusively) onto sex, but they do not try to rectify the sport. We even miss some historical tradition of the medicine suggesting the heretics to give up their conviction, since to be burnt by stake is unhealthy – a perfect field on which the medicine could have practised their ability to tune up religion with life-style.

If we return to ballet, it is a typical specimen of the health sacrifice on the altar of art. What is then the difference with the personal decision of a BDSM addict to be whipped to blood, if the adventure and thrill is a value for her/him? Indeed, while the hips of a dancer will never heal, the buttocks are ready for new session after a few days. Where should then focus the doctors firstly?

In 1970s, the results of Masters & Johnson were merging in our teen minds with our contra-communist interest in the Baroque music. With my friend, who is a fan and connoisseur on the Well-Tempered Clavier, we were discussing that there are fugues which follow the male curve of sexual excitement. - Now, we can trace the psychical model of the male sexual behaviour before the more female romanticism. And we can be sure that J.S. Bach had some experience with the partner-life, thanks to his twenty children – though, today, we can find persons who could gather this experience within two weeks, placidly.

As a score operates with some structure of music (= the parts of a composition in time), its facture (= the "picture" of the score), rhythm, dynamism and instrumentation, in a video documenting sex, we can observe just the parallel elements.

That is why, there is but one human psyche with basically one type of excitement and resolution. While the philosophers like Schopenhauer were pondering over the sublimation up to the art, contrary we can contend that there is plenty of music or poetic opus's, but we have forgotten that their prototype is sexual, and therefore not fundamentally psychological and cultural, but rather carnal and irrational. What is irrational, it can enjoy but a little prestige, in the rational civilization – however it can be essential for the life itself. (See H. Bergson: Creative Evolution.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_Bergson

This is the main reason why the "music forms" of sex have declined into the most rudimentary shapes. Nevertheless, this simplification cannot falsify the thesis about the common essence of sex and art, esp. the sorts of art which are in time.

Now, we can plan to artificialise sex, even with the help and on the ground-plan of the complex art works. The human psyche is the same for both of these life-spheres.

Do you like porn? *Are* you like porn?

Do you like porn? Are you like porn?

The establishment culture treats porn as a dangerous extraterrestrial civilization. Yet, it is produced (and sometimes even created) by people for people. What is more, one porn-tycoon said that 90% of the Internet is porn, and the rest of 10% is acting as if the 90% do not exist. Even, when the USA porn-industry was in crisis (within the general economical context), the government had to treat this fact specifically – such a vast contribution to the flux of money means the porn.

Indeed, without some sort of behaviour nearer to the porn than to the dispassionate mood, the life itself could not continue.

Supposed one is sexual (in contrast to the asexual persons), and under the well-known fact that our sexuality seeks its carnal part (I mean: that sex is not mere psychical dream or fancy), we cannot avoid this or that realization of sex on the level and within our body.

In this context a question rises, who or what arranges the mentioned "extraterrestrial" evading to this unavoidable fate of ours, rather then to face it systematically and straightforward? This is the well known tragedy.

What is contrary a comedy, it is the behaviour of the 10% of civilization facing then to 90%, which are the outcome of the evading the straightforward research of the motivation leading to such a sophisticated industry as is the porn-industry.

Duly is the establishment afraid to include porn into anthropology and culturology: the individual items of pleasure would prove items of humanity and the present civilization would be unmasked as inhuman. The question would arise what is the reason of this scientific taboo?

Who are we and what do we deal nowadays?

"Nowadays" – it means the situation when sexuality in its pleasurable face is not supported by science. Neither is the sexual pleasure – namely the aim to arrange the genuine, cultural sex studio, the sexuarium - supported by the establishment culture from the taxes. So, our cultural solution is restricted to sustainable survival with the fund raising, hoping that some portion of money can be assigned to the taboo-free science.

Sexuality is one of our essential motivations and functions. It is not an entertainment and it cannot be omitted.

We do not deal in vacuum. We cannot avoid competing with somebody. They are the illegal business with sex and the sexual entertainment.

On the other hand, there are forms of sex which lessen the number of our customers: the legal forms of sex available. Some of them are really nice, yet – fortunately for us – the majority is of lesser dignity and/or pleasure.

Sex in marriage is used to be limited to bedroom – which is not the optimal sex studio. The solo-sex is lonely – which becomes frustrating. Mutuality is essential part of sex, and were it not, the life stops continue, neither there is any threat of STD's.

For the persons to whom practising sex without body-penetration is emotionally acceptable (or even desired), this non-penetrative form can fullfil – at least sometimes – their sex in mutuality (since the mutuality does not depend on penetration). - Just one argument the scientific sexology neither examines, nor prepares for the user packages, in spite of the fact that it is mainly penetration what spreads HIV/AIDS!

We can even continue in the generalization what science does not work out. We know from the sexshops that some tools and toys are sold – but we do not have the scientifically corroborated why, how far, for how many persons, etc., the sort of questions upon which a serious marketing is used to build.

What is even worse: we cannot count from porn for sure what is a show and what is the personal experience of the actors – which can function also as an applicable example for the audience, concerning the sexual satisfaction. [Unfortunately, we – as higher hominids – are prone to ape anything, including the risky sex. If our project rationally arranges the conditions for the safe sex, we can lobby for some support from the establishment culture, which would at least increase our visibility.]

Therefore, concerning pleasure and satisfaction we can build upon but a limited experience of the life-practice, upon some empirical facts – yet, not upon science, up to now.

Anyhow, the scientifically supported guidelines how to avoid risk are specific enough to decide what sort of sex-support implementation will be legal, and so approved by the Public Health authorities. It is quite relevant, since the authorities have the measures for their decision; and we have a strong argument: since the authorities cannot ask us "what we want, in fact".

With this position described, I can specify that - for this first phase - I look for the persons who want (and who are able, thanks to their education and work-practice) work out the legal safe-sex concept.

Later on, there will be quite many now jobs! So many that it is worth several specific analysis for each of them.

There are many known – yet not systematically implemented – ways to satisfy the sexual pleasure safely, and the more with several marketing implementations of this demand and both humanitarian and commercial aims, which brings about very many new jobs. So, it is worth and necessary work out the concept, the marketing plan and the implementation. Then the common employees can enter the stage.

I agree with the persons for whom this essay may seem trivial: I only argue that if a target group is specified together with the proper product to satisfy their need, the usual management and marketing can take place. So, in a moment we can refer to the common textbooks. After a short big-bang text, the vast well established instruction follows. - On the other hand, the illegal risky-sex sexual-industries have the management and marketing richly developed and quite sophisticated. What is missing to them, it is the stamp of the Public Health authorities together with the police evidence concerning the common criminality.

Sex in the Facebook era

Dear Friends,


today, I have published my new project, Sex in the Facebook era.

http://www.sexuarium.eu/sex-in-the-facebook-era.htm

It is focused on the new jobs creation, in a field with (almost) total target group and not filled-in possibilities, from afar.

Welcome!