"Nowadays" – it means the situation when sexuality in its pleasurable face is not supported by science. Neither is the sexual pleasure – namely the aim to arrange the genuine, cultural sex studio, the sexuarium - supported by the establishment culture from the taxes. So, our cultural solution is restricted to sustainable survival with the fund raising, hoping that some portion of money can be assigned to the taboo-free science.
Sexuality is one of our essential motivations and functions. It is not an entertainment and it cannot be omitted.
We do not deal in vacuum. We cannot avoid competing with somebody. They are the illegal business with sex and the sexual entertainment.
On the other hand, there are forms of sex which lessen the number of our customers: the legal forms of sex available. Some of them are really nice, yet – fortunately for us – the majority is of lesser dignity and/or pleasure.
Sex in marriage is used to be limited to bedroom – which is not the optimal sex studio. The solo-sex is lonely – which becomes frustrating. Mutuality is essential part of sex, and were it not, the life stops continue, neither there is any threat of STD's.
For the persons to whom practising sex without body-penetration is emotionally acceptable (or even desired), this non-penetrative form can fullfil – at least sometimes – their sex in mutuality (since the mutuality does not depend on penetration). - Just one argument the scientific sexology neither examines, nor prepares for the user packages, in spite of the fact that it is mainly penetration what spreads HIV/AIDS!
We can even continue in the generalization what science does not work out. We know from the sexshops that some tools and toys are sold – but we do not have the scientifically corroborated why, how far, for how many persons, etc., the sort of questions upon which a serious marketing is used to build.
What is even worse: we cannot count from porn for sure what is a show and what is the personal experience of the actors – which can function also as an applicable example for the audience, concerning the sexual satisfaction. [Unfortunately, we – as higher hominids – are prone to ape anything, including the risky sex. If our project rationally arranges the conditions for the safe sex, we can lobby for some support from the establishment culture, which would at least increase our visibility.]
Therefore, concerning pleasure and satisfaction we can build upon but a limited experience of the life-practice, upon some empirical facts – yet, not upon science, up to now.
Anyhow, the scientifically supported guidelines how to avoid risk are specific enough to decide what sort of sex-support implementation will be legal, and so approved by the Public Health authorities. It is quite relevant, since the authorities have the measures for their decision; and we have a strong argument: since the authorities cannot ask us "what we want, in fact".
With this position described, I can specify that - for this first phase - I look for the persons who want (and who are able, thanks to their education and work-practice) work out the legal safe-sex concept.
Later on, there will be quite many now jobs! So many that it is worth several specific analysis for each of them.
There are many known – yet not systematically implemented – ways to satisfy the sexual pleasure safely, and the more with several marketing implementations of this demand and both humanitarian and commercial aims, which brings about very many new jobs. So, it is worth and necessary work out the concept, the marketing plan and the implementation. Then the common employees can enter the stage.
I agree with the persons for whom this essay may seem trivial: I only argue that if a target group is specified together with the proper product to satisfy their need, the usual management and marketing can take place. So, in a moment we can refer to the common textbooks. After a short big-bang text, the vast well established instruction follows. - On the other hand, the illegal risky-sex sexual-industries have the management and marketing richly developed and quite sophisticated. What is missing to them, it is the stamp of the Public Health authorities together with the police evidence concerning the common criminality.
No comments:
Post a Comment